YELLOW SHEET Office of the State Auditor of Missouri |
May 9, 2002
Report No. 2002-35
The following problems were
discovered as a result of an audit conducted by our office of the Village of
Bull Creek, Missouri.
The Village of Bull Creek is experiencing serious
financial difficulty due to the poor management decisions and actions related
to their Phase II sewer project.� As of
June 30, 2001, the village owes approximately $1,390,000 in principal payments
on its sewer system.� Based on their
current financial condition, the village may be unable to meet the debt service
requirements of its sewer projects.� The
financial problems have resulted from the lack of adequate planning and
approval related to the Phase II sewer project which increased the village debt
by $890,000.�� Since the village
proceeded on Phase II without the approval of the Taney County Commission and
the Taney County Regional Sewer District, it has been unable to use the Taney
County's Sewer Sales tax monies distributed to the village to pay the related
debt.
In December 1999, the Board of Trustees
entered into an agreement with the same project manager that managed Phase I to
provide additional sewer improvements.�
Phase II was treated as a "design and build" project in which
the project manager handled all aspects of the project including the selection
of engineers, inspectors, and construction contractors.� The village paid the project manager
approximately $151,000 through December 31, 2001 for work performed on Phase
II.� Additionally, the village paid a
firm (owned by the project manager) $40,000 to arrange financing for Phase II
.� The firm also agreed to assist the
village in refinancing the debt on Phase I.�
Neither the project manager nor the financial advisor submitted itemized
invoices for the services provided.
Through December 31, 2001, the village has paid
approximately $743,000 on Phase II expenditures.� The village did not assure itself that it received the lowest and
best price on the completed project since it did not competitively bid out any
aspect of the project or ensure that bids were required by the project
manager.� Further, the village's lack of
oversight provided little assurance the fees paid the project manager (and the
financial advisor) were reasonable and proper.�
��
The village provides water, sewer, and trash services to
approximately 250 customers.� Computer
records, consisting of utility account billings and delinquent utility
billings, were not properly retained.�
From the utility records that were available, concern was noted
regarding the collection of March 2001 utility bills.� Due to the lack of controls and the inadequacy of the village
records, the village has no assurance that all utility payments received were
properly deposited.
There is no independent oversight or adequate segregation
of duties related to the village's utility system.� The former Village Administrator and his wife (who served as
Village Clerk until July 2001) performed all functions related to generating
monthly utility bills, receipting and recording utility payments, making credit
adjustments, depositing money received, and monitoring accounts for
delinquencies.��
The former Village Administrator was allowed to use
village equipment for his personal use.�
In addition, the former Village Administrator and his wife spent
numerous hours (approximately 15 hours per week) on the village telephone to
access the village's Internet service provider.� During a three month period, over 10,900 minutes were used to
access the internet and the village was originally billed over $1,600 for the
related long distance charges.��
The audit also includes some matters related to bidding and expenditures, budgets and financial reporting, personnel procedures, ordinances and board meetings, accounting records and procedures, fixed asset procedures, and the municipal court, upon which the village should consider and take appropriate corrective action.�