![]() |
YELLOW SHEET Office of the State Auditor of Missouri |
Report No. 2000-77
August 23, 2000
The following problems
were discovered as a result of a review conducted by our office of the
Department of Corrections, Western Reception and Diagnostic Correctional
Center.
The Western Reception and Diagnostic Correctional
Center was originally established as a satellite facility of the Western
Missouri Correctional Center in 1993 and occupied one building on the grounds
of the St. Joseph State Hospital. The
intent of the satellite facility was for the inmates to help the community with
the massive devastation to the local area from the 1993 floods. In 1994, the Park Building Treatment Center
became operational and the decision was made by the Department of Corrections
to take over the old hospital facilities once the hospital had moved to its new
site. The final phase of construction
was completed in September 1999. The
newly named Western Reception and Diagnostic Correctional Center is the
Department of Corrections’ reception center for the western region of the
state. Newly convicted offenders or
those returned from probation and parole supervision, will be housed there
while they undergo evaluation and classification to determine their permanent
institutional assignments. The Western
Reception and Diagnostic Correctional Center will continue to house general
population offenders and offenders participating in substance abuse prevention
programs. The total capacity for all
classifications of offenders is 1,880.
The Western Reception and Diagnostic Correctional Center
(WRDCC) maintains an armory for firearms, ammunition, chemical agents,
restraints, and miscellaneous items which are accessed through the armory
sergeant, armory officer, or shift supervisor at the control center.
·
To account for the issuance of these firearms and
ammunitions, an armory log is maintained which is a written record of routine
and emergency distributions of firearms.
A review of the armory log for June 1999 revealed that firearms were
recorded as being issued to a particular post rather than to an individual. In addition, the individual actually issued
the firearm was not required to sign the log.
The armory log should provide a record of who has responsibility for
each weapon issued.
·
Monthly physical inventories of the armory are
performed by the same armory officer that has custody of inventory. This practice is in violation of department
procedures which state that the physical inventory must be verified by an
institutional employee whose duties do not include the maintenance of that
particular inventory.
·
The armory’s perpetual inventory records have not been
updated since June 1999. As a result, a
comparison of physical inventory counts to balances recorded in the perpetual
records in not possible, and the effectiveness of the periodic physical
inventory procedures is minimized.
Department procedures require the armory to maintain a perpetual
inventory of stock.
In January 1999, the Department of Corrections, Division
of Offender Rehabilitative Services entered into a contract with Missouri
Western State College to provide adult basic education and diagnostic services
to WRDCC. Contract expenditures totaled
$229,331 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999.
Each month the WRDCC receives an invoice accompanied by
an itemized listing of all program expenses with a payroll report
attached. Supporting documentation is
not routinely provided for the non-payroll expense entries, such as travel
costs, educational and data processing supplies, telephone, etc. As a result, significant payments are being
approved without obtaining supporting documentation.
A careful review of supporting documentation is
necessary, at least on a periodic basis, to substantiate the validity,
propriety, and reasonableness of amounts billed by the college. Because WRDCC personnel are more familiar
with the college personnel and services being provided, it appears essential
that these detailed comparisons of billings to supporting documentation be
performed at the correctional center prior to transmitting the billing to the
Department of Corrections – Central Office for payment.
Other items noted in the report included:
·
Vending machine commissions paid to the facility did
not comply with the written agreement resulting in an approximate underpayment
of $774 from October 1998 to December 1999.
·
There is no independent verification of physical counts
of food inventory items. Food
requisitions are not being properly signed by the food service manager. U.S. Department of Agriculture foods are not
being properly reported.
·
Perpetual inventory records are not maintained for all
canteen items. Month-end physical
inventory counts of canteen food and personal items are not compared to any
records and no one independent of the canteen verifies the inventory counts.
· Some inmate monies found during the intake process are not being recorded on the reception center receipts log.